<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will God mess around with our scientific experiments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egalicontrarian.com/index.php/2009/07/23/will-god-mess-around-with-our-scientific-experiments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egalicontrarian.com/index.php/2009/07/23/will-god-mess-around-with-our-scientific-experiments/</link>
	<description>a blog full of magic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: non-metaphysical stephen</title>
		<link>http://egalicontrarian.com/index.php/2009/07/23/will-god-mess-around-with-our-scientific-experiments/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>non-metaphysical stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalicontrarian.com/?p=306#comment-555</guid>
		<description>I agree with your comment about non-interference. The idea that science assumes God won&#039;t interfere doesn&#039;t contradict the idea that I as a believer also assume God won&#039;t interfere. Have Christians in the sciences ever gotten different results from their atheist colleagues?  (I&#039;m reminded of the passage in Jeremiah where God has made a covenant with the sun and moon--thus establishing their motion as having its own independent, natural law. I also wonder why, if God didn&#039;t interfere when my check bounced, God would interfere when I&#039;m trying to establish the melting point of ice....) The idea that science is atheistic is certainly contrary to the thought of Isaac Newton, who assumed that God gave the universe regular motion!

I also like how he admits his theory is a leap -- a leap of faith? Hmmm... I&#039;ve had discussions where I&#039;ve argued your idea (&quot;almost every activity justifies general atheism, including several religious activities&quot;) in the other direction: whereas the atheistic-science argument makes all activities atheistic, I make the case that the lack of 100% certainty makes a lot of daily activities, including scientific ones, reliant on faith. There&#039;s always an element of trust. 

But then, Hume established that quite well, didn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comment about non-interference. The idea that science assumes God won&#8217;t interfere doesn&#8217;t contradict the idea that I as a believer also assume God won&#8217;t interfere. Have Christians in the sciences ever gotten different results from their atheist colleagues?  (I&#8217;m reminded of the passage in Jeremiah where God has made a covenant with the sun and moon&#8211;thus establishing their motion as having its own independent, natural law. I also wonder why, if God didn&#8217;t interfere when my check bounced, God would interfere when I&#8217;m trying to establish the melting point of ice&#8230;.) The idea that science is atheistic is certainly contrary to the thought of Isaac Newton, who assumed that God gave the universe regular motion!</p>
<p>I also like how he admits his theory is a leap &#8212; a leap of faith? Hmmm&#8230; I&#8217;ve had discussions where I&#8217;ve argued your idea (&#8220;almost every activity justifies general atheism, including several religious activities&#8221;) in the other direction: whereas the atheistic-science argument makes all activities atheistic, I make the case that the lack of 100% certainty makes a lot of daily activities, including scientific ones, reliant on faith. There&#8217;s always an element of trust. </p>
<p>But then, Hume established that quite well, didn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harris on Francis Collins &#124; EGALICONTRARIAN</title>
		<link>http://egalicontrarian.com/index.php/2009/07/23/will-god-mess-around-with-our-scientific-experiments/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harris on Francis Collins &#124; EGALICONTRARIAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalicontrarian.com/?p=306#comment-550</guid>
		<description>[...] atheists concerned about the Virgin Birth destroying medical science, Harris is afraid of the practical implications [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] atheists concerned about the Virgin Birth destroying medical science, Harris is afraid of the practical implications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

